Existence and Reminiscence

Within our sea of existence, we look back at the rippled waters of history, look at the current boat we sit upon, and look forward to the endless horizon. Memorials serve as a way to honor the past, be grateful for the present, and look forward to the future.
This week in class we discussed the many roles of memorials in remembering the fallen soldiers of costly wars. How memorials are presented have huge and lasting impacts on individual loved ones as well as the whole nation. For example, cenotaphs serve as a linear account of time, presenting events in chronological order without anachronisms. On the other hand, a memorial in the form of a book, such as Tim O'Brien's "The Things they Carried", can use nonlinear narratives and take liberty in presenting its accounts of war. Both serve as mediums to reminisce the past, but both have their fair share of advantages and disadvantages. Cenotaphs are unique artifacts in that they commemorate the bodies of soldiers who are forever "missing in action", and serve as "proxies for those bodies that were simultaneously absent and present, physically gone but stunningly felt in psychological and emotional terms" (Booth). They offer placeholders for the brave men and women who sacrificed their lives for the nation and give loved ones something to hold on to. On a more abstract level, nonlinear narratives like those of O'Brien's novel emphasize broader thinking and offer greater perspective on war, although they may not even be true. Nonetheless, both are very effective in guiding mourners and citizens of a nation from the past onward towards the future while making sure to reminisce the moment.

Comments

  1. I liked the way you explained the differences in nonlinear narratives and linear narratives, and backed them up with examples such as cenotaphs and stories, such as in The Things They Carried. Perhaps more insight could be given into why each technique is effective, and how each one has its different advantages and disadvantages, using examples as evidence. Overall, good write.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First I am going to say that I really appreciate the length of your blog entry. A lot of people's were very long and did not grab my attention. You though managed to get your thoughts in a rather short yet effective blurb. I do agree with Eric though, a little more insight on the topics instead of surface analysis would have made the entry more effective. Don't be afraid to spice up the work and personalize it!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Really Confident Girl

Bubbles!

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle